For the reasons stated in Hest Technologies, Inc. v. State ex rel. Perdue, 366 N.C. 289, 749 S.E.2d 429 (2012) (No. 169A11-2), the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed.
REVERSED.
No. 170A11-2
(Filed 14 December 2012)
Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, — N.C. App. —■, 724 S.E.2d 614 (2012), reversing an order entered on 29 November 2010 by Judge Paul C. Ridgeway in Superior Court, Wake County. Heard in the Supreme Court on 17 October 2012.
*324 Daughtry, Woodard, Lawrence & Starling, by Kelly K. Daughtry, for plaintiff-appellees.
Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by John F. Maddrey, Solicitor General, and Hal F. Askins, Special Deputy Attorney General, for defendant-appellants.
PER CURIAM.
For the reasons stated in Hest Technologies, Inc. v. State ex rel. Perdue, 366 N.C. 289, 749 S.E.2d 429 (2012) (No. 169A11-2), the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed.
REVERSED.