Upon consideration of plaintiffs petition for discretionary review and defendant’s (Copland, Inc.) petition for discretionary review, the following order is entered: The petitions are allowed 5 June 1997 for the limited purpose of addressing the issues raised in the petitions as to the applicability of the “thin skull” rule and the instruction given by the trial court. All other issues requested for review are denied 5 June 1997.
Poole v. Copland, Inc., 346 N.C. 282 (1997)
June 5, 1997
·
Supreme Court of North Carolina
·
No. 145PA97
346 N.C. 282
POOLE v. COPLAND, INC.
No. 145PA97
Case below: 125 N.C.App. 235