For the reasons stated in this Court’s decision in Harris v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 332 N.C. 184, 420 S.E.2d 124 (1992), the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Amos v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance, 332 N.C. 340 (1992)
Sept. 4, 1992
·
Supreme Court of North Carolina
·
No. 393PA91
332 N.C. 340
KIMBERLY DAWN AMOS v. NORTH CAROLINA FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
No. 393PA91
(Filed 4 September 1992)
On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 of a decision of the Court of Appeals, 103 N.C. App. 629, 406 S.E.2d 652 (1991), affirming an order entered 16 July 1990, nunc pro tunc, 2 July 1990, by Downs, J., in the Superior Court, GRAHAM County. Heard in the Supreme Court 11 February 1992.
Zeyland G. McKinney, Jr., and Leonard W. Lloyd for plaintiffappellee.
Willardson & Lipscomb, by William F. Lipscomb, for defendant-appellant.
dissenting.
I dissent for the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in Harris v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 332 N.C. 184, 195, 420 S.E.2d 124, 131 (1992).
Justice LAKE joins in this dissenting opinion.