By the Gth Ch. Rev. Stat. Sec. 13, power is given to a single magistrate out of Court to issue an at*175tachment, in all cases where by the law he has jurisdiction of the sum demanded, and it directs that it shall be made returnable before some justice-on or before thirty days after the date thereof. In this case the attachment is defective and void. After directing the officer to attach so much of the defendant’s property, as may be sufficient to satisfy the plaintiff’s debt, the writ proceeds: “and such estate so attached in your hands to secure or so provide, that the same may be liable to further proceedings thereupon, to be had in relation thereto, according to law, so as to compel the said Hugh G. Porter to appear and answer to the above complaint, when and where you shall make known how you have executed this attachment.” The attachment is not returnable on any particular day, nor before any Justice or Court, nor within thirty days after its teste. It is an absoltó&^^^^^T^is an original process without any retj^ «¡||?. T’S^ife/effect is the case of Clark v. Quinn, 5 Ire. 176, and likewise, the case11 which preceded it, of Dev. 346] The latter was decided airón commom^vp-| principles. Both at common law and uii|er^S^iraattachment in this case is void ; none orahe defeetsrffifíng of a nature to be cured by the appearance of thedefendant. As the attachment is void, a judgment on it would not protect the garnishee against his creditor, and he has therefore a right to make the objection.
Judgment affirmed,