An order lor mnr.w sent to the plaintiff and retained bji him,, is evidence t..at the money was advanced, as the order directs but an order for delivery of goods retained* is not of itself sufficient evidence of the delivery — -there should be some additional evidence to prove that fact.
Blount v. Starkley's administrators, 3 N.C. 75, 2 Hayw. 75 (1799)
March 1799
·
North Carolina Superior Court
3 N.C. 75, 2 Hayw. 75