(after argument.') The plaintiff knew of Auld> yidge’s claim, and has tacen a wrong mode of obtaining redress. He should not have brought an ejectment. The costs have accrued in consequence of this wrong step, which is imputable to him. It is said the defendant was wrong in setting up a defence for the lands claimed by the plaintiff, as he knew he, the defendant, had sot purchased them. The plaintiff however had every reason to believe he would set it up, because he bad taken possession and k“pt it. The first departure from correctness was on the part of tire plaintiff in this bill, and therefore I will not screen him by an injunction, from the costs incurred thereby.
Injunction refused.