alter argument. The advancement jnu^t be es--tii-ais4 according to the value when advanceed*
King v. Worsley, 3 N.C. 366, 2 Hayw. 366 (1805)
Nov. 1805
·
North Carolina Superior Court
3 N.C. 366, 2 Hayw. 366
King and wife vs. Worsley and others.
HP HE plaintiff’s wife, whilst a widow, dissented to her former husband’s will, and now sued for a child’s part: and the question was, as to an advancement made to one of the children, whether that should be estimated according to the present value, ot as was the value when advanced. Tin* advancement consisted ul a wench and one child, but there are now seven children.