The defendant was charged in the bill with the possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale and with unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor under the statute. The State’s evidence tended to show that defendant operated a tavern or road-house known as “Ma’s Tavern”; that the sheriff and his deputies, upon a search of the premises, found 58 pints of whiskey concealed in a trap; that the defend^ ant, who was not present at the time of the search, stated afterwards that “selling a little liquor was the worst thing she ever did.” The defendant offered no evidence. There was general verdict of guilty.
*514Tbe defendant assigns as error tbe ruling of tbe trial judge in permitting a witness to testify that defendant’s tavern was a public place where people went to dance and eat. This does not afford sufficient ground upon wbicb to predicate prejudicial error.
Tbe defendant’s exception to tbe judge’s charge cannot be sustained. Tbe excerpt therefrom, to wbicb exception was noted, was contained in tbe recitation of tbe State’s contentions, and, considered contextually, was insufficient to justify serious complaint. All other exceptions were abandoned. There was evidence sufficient to support tbe verdict, and in tbe trial we find
No error.