Tbe only question for our determination is: What interest or estate P. E. Hines took under tbe paper writing (termed deed) from Lizzie Hines to P. E. Hines, dated 19 March, 1924, and duly recorded in Pitt County, N. C. We think that tbe judgment of tbe court below is correct and that P. E. Hines took no interest or estate in tbe land in controversy, under tbe said paper writing.
To sustain tbe position that P. E. Hines bad a one-balf interest in tbe land, defendants cite C. S., 991, which is as follows: “When real estate is conveyed to any person, tbe same shall be held and construed to be a conveyance in fee, whether tbe word 'heir’ is used or not, unless *328such conveyance in plain and express words shows, or it is plainly intended by the conveyance or some part thereof, that the grantor meant to convey an estate of less dignity.” N. C. Code, 1935 (Michie), sec. 991.
We extract from the paper writing: (1) “Witnesseth: That for and in consideration of natural (love) and affection, and other good and valuable considerations and for the sum of one dollar in hand paid me by P. R. nines, I do hereby give, grant, bargain, sell and convey, lease and let to P. R. Hines, the following described property to P. R. Hines, for Ihe purpose of using the same as a home or unlil I shall see fit to sell ihe same or shall want the possession of said property at any time— (describing land in controversy). (2) To have and to hold the said one-half of said real estate, including one-half of the house room on said place in the dwelling and out houses and especially my rooms in said dwelling to him the said P. R. Hines’ only use and behoof, as a home in said land unlil 1 see fit to sell my said interest in the said property or unlil I shall see fit to repossess said land, and as rents for said property until I shall see fit to sell or repossess the same, P. B. Iiines agrees to pay one-half of the taxes and insurance on said property, and in case I shall see fit to sell the said property or to repossess the same, P. R. Hines agrees to give up and deliver the possession of the same to the said Lizzie Hines upon thirty days’ notice and agrees to keep the same in good repair and return the same in as good condition as of the date of this agreement, wear and tear and accident to the same excepted; and it is further agreed that P. R. Hines shall take possession of my said interest in said property after the 20th day of March, 1924, and from then until I shall wish to repossess or sell ihe same; and it is further agreed that the said P. R. Hines shall be a tenant of said land at my will and that I shall retain full right to dispossess and take said property at any time I shall desire to take possession of the same, and P. R. Hines agrees to give up and deliver possession of the same upon thirty days’ notice as above stated without let or hindrance of any kind whatsoever and he is hereby put into possession of the same to enjoy the quiet possession of same on and after the day above specified. Witness my hand and seal, this 19th day of March, 1924. (Miss) Lizzie Hines (Seal).” (Italics ours.)
It will be noted that the first part of section 991, supra, is qualified by the following: “Unless such conveyance in plain and express words show or it is plainly intended by the conveyance or some part thereof that the grantor meant to convey an estate of less dignity.” The paper writing clearly indicates that it was a lease. “P. R. Hines shall be a tenant of said land at my will,” etc. Twice in the paper writing it is *329set forth that P. R. Hines “agrees to give up and deliver possession of the same . . . upon thirty days’ notice.” We think the construction put on the paper writing by the court below correct, and the judgment is
Affirmed.