This case is practically tbe same as Newman et al. v. Watkins et al., Board of County Commissioners, and Royster et al., Board of Elections of Vance County, ante, 675, and is affirmed for tbe reasons therein stated.
Affirmed.
Hardy v. Burroughs, 208 N.C. 699 (1935)
Nov. 1, 1935
·
Supreme Court of North Carolina
208 N.C. 699
HARDY et al. v. BURROUGHS et al., BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, and MOSELEY et al., BOARD OF ELECTIONS OF WARREN COUNTY.
(Filed 1 November, 1935.)
Appeal by plaintiffs from Devin, J., at June Term, 1935,.of WarreN.
J. PL. Bridgers for appellants.
George C. Green, Perry & Kittrell, Julius Banzet, Stuart Smith, and Frank Banzet for appellees.
dissenting: For tbe reasons given in my dissenting opinion in tbe action of Newman et al. v. Watkins et al., ante, 675, I tbink tbe judgment of tbe court below should be reversed.