Tbe defendants’ appeal from tbe order overruling tbe demurrer to tbe complaint filed by tbe defendants in this action, was dismissed by this Court on tbe ground that tbe question of law presented by tbe demurrer bad become moot and academic, because under tbe depositors’ agreement which the plaintiff bad signed before be became twenty-one years of age, tbe plaintiff bad tbe right, in any event, to demand payment of his check on tbe defendant, Eastern Bank and Trust Company after 20 December, 1932. See McCleese v. Trust Co., 204 N. C., 355, 168 S. E., 210. Tbe defendants did not except to or appeal from tbe judgment at Spring Term, 1933. Tbe right of the *348plaintiff to maintain tliis action, wbieb was begun on 23 September, 1932, is not presented by this appeal.
The only question presented by plaintiff’s appeal is whether there was error in the judgment directing the clerk of the court to deliver to the defendants the North Carolina bond in his possession, to be held and disposed of by the defendant, Gurney P. Hood, Commissioner of Eanks, as an asset of the defendant, Eastern Bank and Trust Company, for the payment of its general creditors. On the facts found by the judge, the plaintiff has a lien on the bond for the payment of his judgment in this action. It was error to order the bond delivered to the defendants as a general asset of the Eastern Bank and Trust Company. The plaintiff is entitled to an order for the enforcement of his lien on the bond. The judgment should be modified to that end.
Modified and affirmed.