This case was here before — Pasquotank County v. Surety Co., 201 N. C., 325.
The following judgment was rendered by the court below; “This cause coming on to be heard, and it appearing to the court that the opinion of the Supreme Court affirming the judgment heretofore rendered has been certified to this court and been on file for more than ten days prior to *285this term; and it further appearing from said opinion that tbe plaintiffs are entitled to tbe possession of tbe notes and securities referred to in tbe judgment in tbis case as collateral security for tbe full amount of tbe indebtedness herein adjudged against tbe defendant administrator in tbe sum of $59,811.81, with interest thereon from 9 April, 1929, and to have tbe receivership heretofore ordered in this cause discharged and terminated; and it further appearing that tbe defendants herein have requested tbe court to continue tbe receivership; it is now, therefore, ordered that tbis cause be retained and tbe receivership continued for further orders and that said receivers continue to make diligent effort to collect said securities, reporting their progress from time to time to tbis court. It is further ordered that all collections shall be turned over in toto to the plaintiffs until tbe amount of same plus the recovery heretofore obtained against the bonds shall be equal to the full amount of the indebtedness adjudged against the administrator. The plaintiffs will recover against the defendants the costs of the receivership from this day forward, and the costs in this action to be taxed by the clerk.”
We think that so much of the judgment that the plaintiff recover against the defendants “costs of the receivership from this day forward” premature and should be stricken out. To this extent there is error in the judgment.
Error.