Note. — Vide Burton v. Sheppard, post 399.—Erwin & Wife v. Arthur’s Ex’rs. Con. Rep. 490.—State v. Jackson & Davis, 3 Murph. 230.
Snoden v. Humphries, 2 N.C. 29, 1 Hayw. 29 (1793)
April 1793
·
North Carolina Superior Court
2 N.C. 29, 1 Hayw. 29
Snoden v. Humphries.
This was an action of debt, and verdict for the Plaintiff. Motion in arrest of judgment, and upon argument the motion overruled. From which sentence the Defendant appealed, and now on motion of Mr. Hamilton, that the cause should stand not on the reasons in arrest, but as a new cause on the issue to the country $ it was so ruled per curiam, consisting of Judges Ashe and Wra-xiams. Ex relatione.