A careful examination of tbe records reveals no reversible error committed on trial. Tbe cases are simple and involve no new question of law. It would serve no useful purpose to set out tbe evidence.
No error.
State v. Scoggins, 199 N.C. 821 (1930)
Dec. 10, 1930
·
Supreme Court of North Carolina
199 N.C. 821
STATE v. BILL SCOGGINS.
(Filed 10 December, 1930.)
Appeal by defendant from Moore, J., at April Term, 1930, of Polic.
Criminal prosecutions tried upon indictments charging tbe defendant (1) with baying and keeping in bis possession spirituous or vinous liquors for tbe purpose of sale (C. S., 3379) and with transporting tbe same (C. S., 3411(b), and (2) with resisting an officer in violation of C. S., 4378.
From an adverse verdict on both indictments, and judgments of eighteen months on tbe roads on each indictment, to run concurrently, tbe defendant appeals, assigning errors.
Attorney-General Brum/mitt and Assistant Attorney-General Nash for the State.
Quinn, Hamrick & Harris and J. S. Dockery for defendant.