Do the words “the Commission shall assess against such payroll a maintenance fund tax computed,”, etc., contained in section 73, subsection (j) of the Workmen’s Compensation Act constitute the proceeds of such assessment a special fund for the exclusive use of the Industrial Commission?
The Industrial Commission is an agency of the State, established by chapter 120, Public Laws of 1929.
The General Assembly having created this important arm of service, undertook to provide for the maintenance and support thereof. It now appears that the general appropriation is wholly inadequate to enable the Commission to discharge with efficiency the extensive duties required by the law, thus resulting in a serious impairment of the quality of service to be rendered the people of the State. Chapter 280, Public Laws of 1929, Division 4, Item 17, appropriated for the maintenance of the Commission the sum of $42,000 for each year of the biennium.
The plaintiff contends that if it is permitted to use the proceeds of the assessments against self-insurers that such assessments will create for its use a sum not only sufficient, but perhaps in excess of its reasonable needs. The Commission further contends that the General Assembly, realizing that the general appropriation might be inadequate, used the words “maintenance fund tax” in section 73, subsection (j) in the sense of an additional appropriation for its use.
It is manifest, therefore, that the ease turns upon the construction of the words “a maintenance fund tax” employed in said section 73 (j). It must be noted that this section does not empower the Commission to collect the money, but merely to levy the assessment. It must be further noted that if the funds derived from the assessment should exceed the amount reasonably necessary for the use of the Commission that no provision is made for the disposition of any balance.
It must be conceded that the language is indefinite and capable of more than one construction. In order, therefore, to arrive at the true construction, it is manifest that the words employed by the General *598Assembly must be read and interpreted in tbe light of tbe general policy of tbe State with reference to the maintenance of State agencies. An examination of legislative acts pertinent thereto clearly disclose tbe outstanding fact that tbe budget system is a fixed policy of tbe State. This idea is fully supported by tbe provisions of tbe Consolidated Budget Act, which is chapter 100, Public Laws of 1929. Section 5 of said act provides that “all moneys heretofore and hereafter appropriated shall be deemed and held to be within the terms of this act and subject to its provisions unless it shall be otherwise provided in the act apppropriat-ing the same; and no money shall be disbursed from the State Treasury except as herein provided.” Again in section 17 thereof it is declared: “The provisions of this act shall continue to be the legislative policy with reference to the making of appropriations and shall be treated as rules of both branches of the General Assembly until and unless the same may be changed by the General Assembly either by express enactment or by rule adopted by either branch of the General Assembly.” The same idea is further expressed in section 18 of said act, providing that “every State department, . . . Commission . . . shall operate under an appropriation made in accordance with the provisions of this act; and no State department, . . . Commission or other State agency, . . . shall expend any money, except in pursuance of such appropriation, and the rules, requirements and regulations made pursuant to this act.”
. These provisions of law demonstrate beyond a doubt that the Industrial Commission must operate within the provisions and limitations of the budgetary policy of the State as declared by the General Assembly.
However, sections 28 and 29 of the Budget Act refer to departments or agencies “as receive moneys available for expenditures by them.” Section 29 provides: “It is the intent and purpose of this act that every department . . . Commission . . . that expends money appropriated by the General Assembly or money collected by or for such department, . . . Commission, or agencies . . •. under any general law of this State, shall be subject to and under the control of every provision of this act,” etc.
Conceding, by broad interpretation, that the words “maintenance fund tax” occurring in section 73 (j) of the Workmen’s Compensation Act created a fund available for the use of the Commission, the provisions of sections 28 and 29 of chapter 100 of Public Laws of 1929 limit or restrict the availability of such funds by providing that the expenditure thereof “shall be subject to and under the control of every provision of this act.” In other words, if a State agency collects or receives funds available for its use, who must determine the amount to be used by any *599sucb agency in-the absence of express or necessarily implied legislative designation ? If the agency receiving the fnnds can nse them according to its own discretion or according to its own idea of its needs or necessities, then clearly, large sums of the State’s money would be unbudgeted, and the whole scheme of law which is built upon a sound fiscal policy, would become a medley of financial confusion and a patchwork of financial control.
Viewing the law in its entirety, we are of the opinion, and so adjudge, that the proceeds derived from self-insurers under the Compensation.Act are available for the use of the Industrial Commission, and that under the law the.Budget Bureau has the power and .authority to allocate to the Commission the whole of such proceeds of such amounts thereof as in the judgment of the Budget Bureau may he reasonably necessary for the proper and efficient maintenance of the Commission.
The record-in the case at bar discloses that the Commission will be greatly handicapped unless additional funds can be allocated. ■ The Budget Bureau has the power, under the law, to meet this emergency by permitting the Commission to use the fund in controversy and other funds of similar nature to the extent and to the amount necessary to enable it to serve in an efficient manner the people of this State.. -.
Beversed.