Plaintiff’s intestate was the victim of an unfortunate accident, but the evidence fails to disclose any liability on the part of the defendant.
Affirmed.
Shutt v. Reynolds-Lybrook Farm, 194 N.C. 803 (1927)
Nov. 2, 1927
·
Supreme Court of North Carolina
194 N.C. 803
E. F. SHUTT, Administrator, v. REYNOLDS-LYBROOK FARM.
(Filed 2 November, 1927.)
Appeal by plaintiff from Harding, J., at March Term, 1927, of Fobsyth.
Civil action in tort to recover damages for the death of plaintiff’s intestate, alleged to have been caused by the wrongful act, neglect or default of defendant.
*804Eugene Shutt, a man 34 years of age, bad worked on defendant’s farm for more than seven years and had been foreman of the place about three and one-half years, when on 29 September, 1923, while disking a field with a caterpillar tractor, preparatory to sowing grain, he was mortally injured in a fall beneath the tractor as it ran too near a ditch, the bank giving way and causing the tractor to turn over.
It is not alleged that the tractor was defective. Plaintiff bottoms his action on the alleged circumstance of negligence in that the defendant failed to warn the deceased of the soft ground and the danger of running too near the ditch.
At the close of plaintiff’s evidence the defendant lodged a motion for judgment as in case of nonsuit, which was allowed. Plaintiff appeals, assigning error.
Wallace- & Wells and Benbow, Hall & Benbow for plaintiff.
Manly, Hendren & Womble for defendant.