The plaintiff considers two assignments of error in the brief, and under our rules all others are deemed abandoned.
*533Tbe first of these is to tbe admission of tbe evidence of Mr. Pitt, tbe conductor, wbicb is objected to on tbe ground tbat be did not testify from bis own knowledge, but from bis records. It does not appear from tbe record tbat any exception was taken to tbis evidence, but if tbe exception was duly entered, tbe record does not bear out tbe statement 'tbat be was not speaking of bis own knowledge. He says, among other things: “I was on tbe train 15 March, 1912; was in control of train. I remember stopping in Eure; am not positive who got on or off. Tbe train made its usual stops and at usual places. I got off with lantern, as I always do. I stand between white and colored car. He did not get off there. I know tbe train did not make an unusual stop. I was telling what happened at Eure tbat night. I do know that we three got off with our lights, if there were no others. I know for a fact; know tbat tbe train stopped at Eure. If train bad made an unusual stop a record would have been made of it. I don’t say I remember everything tbat happened tbat night, but nothing unusual happened.” »
Tbe second assignment of error is tbat bis Honor presented a contention of the defendant tbat tbe plaintiff attempted to get off tbe train before being invited to do so, and while it was in motion, and tbis is based upon tbe contention that there was no evidence to support tbis view. There is no direct evidence of tbe fact, but tbe circumstances relied on by tbe defendant justified submitting it to tbe jury.
Tbe evidence of tbe defendant tended to prove tbat tbe train stopped at tbe usual place, and tbe evidence for tbe plaintiff tbat be got off or fell from tbe train before tbe train reached tbe'usual stopping place.
Tbe jury bad tbe right, to accept a part of tbe plaintiff’s evidence and reject other parts of it, and if tbe train stopped at tbe usual place and tbe plaintiff stepped or fell off tbe train, where be says be did, tbe train must have been in motion at tbat time.
His Honor charged tbe jury fully, and gave practically all tbe instructions asked by tbe plaintiff, and tbe jury upon a fair charge has answered tbe issue against him.
We find
No error.