Tie effect of special and general appearances is fully considered in tie learned opinion of Justice Walker in Scott v. Life Association, 137 N. C., 517, in wiici it is ield tiat a special appearance cannot be entered except for tie purpose of moving to dismiss for want of jurisdiction, and tiat if tie motion affects tie merits, tie appearance is -general; and it is there said: “Tie test for determining tie character of an appearance is tie relief asked, tie law looking to its substance rather than to its form. If tie appearance is in effect general, tie fact tiat tie xmrty styles it a special apj)earance will not change its real character. 3 Cyc., pp. 502, 503. Tie question always is, what a party has done, and not what he intended to do. If tie relief juayed affects tie merits or tie motion involves tie merits, and a motion to vacate a judgment is such a motion, then tie appearance is in law a general one.”
It follows 'from this statement of.tie law tiat tie appearance in Bertie for tie puiqoose of making 'a motion to remove tie action to Northampton County was general, although styled special, and if so, it cured any defects in tie process and gave tie court jurisdiction of tie person of the defendant.
If, however, there was any doubt upon this question, it ax> pears in tie record tiat tie defendant afterwards formally entered a general appearance in Northampton and moved for a continuance, wiici made a service of tie summons unnecessary.
Tie other ground for tie motion to dismiss is on account of alleged defects in tie verification of tie complaint.
It is true, as contended by tie defendant, tiat an objection to tie verification of a complaint in an action for divorce is jurisdictional (Hopkins v. Hopkins, 132 N. C., 23; Johnson v. Johnson, 142 N. C., 462), but in our ox>inion tie verification in this case substantially complies with tie statute, and particularly as tie complaint alleges no facts on information and belief, but if it did not, tie judge states tiat tie plaintiff is *532allowed to amend the affidavit of verification by adding, “That the facts set forth in the complaint are true to the best of affiant’s knowledge and belipf,” which conforms to the words of the statute. This disposes of both appeals.
There is no error.
Affirmed.