The plaintiffs seek to enjoin the levy of the special tax for school purposes principally upon two grounds, viz.: 1. That no place was named as the polling place in the order calling the election. 2. That the registration books were not kept open for the number of days required by law.' As bearing upon the two questions, his Honor finds that the election was held at Indian Trail, where the schoolhouse is located and where all elections are held for that township and district; that the place where the election was held was known to all the voters and accepted by them, and that they knew this election would be held there; that the omission to name the particular place for holding this election was not discovered by anyone until after this action was brought and 'after complaint was filed, so well understood was the place where the election would be held; “that the time and place for holding said election was well and generally understood and known by all in the district”; “that every qualified voter in said district had a fair and ample opportunity to register and vote in said election if he had so desired”; that- the registration books were opened on May 3d by the regularly appointed and sworn registrar, and the books were kept open until and *586including May 22d, except on parts of tbe two days, May 20th. and 21st. It appears that during the parts of these two days when the registrar was absent from his home no person applied for registration. Section 4115, Revisal, requires that “the election shall be held in the district, under the law governing general elections, as near as may be:” Section 4323 prescribes that it “shall be his (the registrar’s) duty, between the hours of nine o’clock A. M. and sunset on each day (Sunday excepted), for twenty days preceding the day for closing the registration books, to keep open said books for the registration of any electors residing within such township, ward or precinct and entitled to registration.” Disregarding the qualifying phrase, “as near as may be,” in section 4115, Revisal, it was not in the contemplation of section 4323 that the registrar of election should be present at his home or the place of registration every moment of the twenty days, from nine A. M. to sunset. A reasonable compliance is all that the law would require — such presence as would enable every citizen qualified to register to have his name placed upon the registration books. A full opportunity to register is the utmost that the statute contemplates, and this his Honor finds as a fact was afforded, “that every qualified voter in said district had a fair and ample opportunity to register.” What more could any voter have required? Was not such an opportunity, at least, “as near as may be,” the strict and literal requirement of the words of the statute ? All that any voter may require is a “full and ample opportunity” to complete his qualifications by registration as an elector. While we would not approve any substantial departure from the statutory period for registration for a general or special election, we would not feel justified in declaring void an election when the facts disclosed that no citizen qualified to vote was denied the opportunity to register. The purpose of every election is to ascertain the will of every citizen qualified to participate therein, and when “full and ample opportunity” is given him we do not conceive what more can be added. Upon the facts found by his Honor, which the evidence sustains, we conclude that there was no error committed by him in his ruling on this question. The decisions of this Court in the following cases support this conclusion. DeBerry v. Nicholson, 102 N. C., 465, in which this Court quoted these words of Breese, J., in Platt v. People, 29 Ill., 72: “The rules prescribed by law for conducting an election are designed chiefly to afford an opportunity for the free and fair exercise of the elective franchise and to ascertain with certainty the result.” Hendersonville v. Jordan, 150 N. C., 35. Was the omission to *587name tbe particular place for bolding tbe election, under tbe facts as found by bis Honor, fatal to tbe election ? Unless constrained to do so by some positive and unequivocal words of tbe statute law, we would not bold an election void where every person qualified to vote bad “full and ample ’opportunity” to register, where be knew where tbe election was held, where tbe place was easily accessible to him, where tbe place at which tbe election was held was tbe place where every election for national, State, county and township officers was held. While we are not disposed to regard as directory, but as mandatory, tbe statutory provision that tbe places where elections are to be held should be fixed and published by tbe boards or commissions authorized by statute, and while we recognize .the rule that in-cases of special elections it is incumbent upon tbe authorities vested by legislative enactment with tbe power to fix tbe time and place to name both in tbe order calling tbe election, we do not feel authorized to vitiate an election where it is found as a fact that every person in tbe territory qualified to vote knew where tbe election was to be held and where it was held, and bad an opportunity to register to qualify him to express bis will, and where a clear majority of all those persons of full age and qualified (except for registration) bad assented to tbe proposition. To annul such an election would disappoint and disregard tbe will of a majority, to ascertain which is tbe object of all elections. We, however, must again admonish those invested with tbe power to call special elections to adhere to and observe with strictness all tbe statutory requirements in order that their omissions may not jeopardize tbe expressed will of tbe people. It is always safe to regard as important what the statutes expressly direct; in observing them, no barm can result. In sustaining bis Honor in this case, we can, fortunately, give effect to tbe express will of tbe majority of tbe qualified voters of this district without violating any well-settled principle of statutory construction. Tbe fact that a remote section of tbe district, to-wit, Stallings or Atalanta, struggling with tbe education of its children without calling upon tbe public fund for aid, is to receive some aid from tbe public fund, ought not to arouse tbe condemnation of those who believe in the beneficent effects of general education. In this great cause we would do well to keep in mind tbe generous words of Commodore Schley, sent after tbe battle of Santiago, “In our victory there is glory enough for us all.” We find no error in tbe order of bis Honor, and tbe same is
Affirmed.