Bullock v. Bullock, 14 N.C. 260, 3 Dev. 260 (1831)

Dec. 1831 · Supreme Court of North Carolina

14 N.C. 260, 3 Dev. 260

Benjamin Bullock v. Edward Bullock Ex’r. of Micajah Bullock.

Where non assumpsit and the statute of limitations are pleaded, and the jury find the general issue for the defendant, this court will, not examine the charg-e of the judge on the plea of the statute.

The case of Morisey v.. Bunting, (ante 1 ml. 3,) approved.

This was an action of assumpsit, tried at Granville, on the last circuit, before Norwood, Judge.

Pleas — general issue .and the statute of limitations. The plaintiff excepted to the charge of the judge upon the plea of the statute of limitations. The jury returned the following verdict: “ that the defendant’s testator did not assume.” Upon this verdict judgment was rendered for the defendant, from which the plaintiff appealed.

Bevereux, for the plaintiff.

No counsel appeared for the defendant.

Ruepin, Judge.

The court is precluded from considering the judge’s charge by the verdjet on the general issue. It is found by the jury that the defendant’s testator did not assume ; which puts the other issue, on the statute of limitations, and the instructions of the Superior Court on it out of the question. As the existence of the debt is negatived, the judgment must of course be affirmed: To this Morisey v. Bunting, (ante 1 vol. 3,) besides other cases, is a direct authority.

Per Curiam.--‘Judgment appirmed.