Eor the reasons set out in State v. Briggs et al., at this term, there was error in the judgment of the Court below, and there must be a new trial.
Eeversed.
Douglas, J., dissenting.
State v. Pilkerton, 130 N.C. 745 (1902)
1902
·
Supreme Court of North Carolina
130 N.C. 745
STATE, Appellant, v. J. M. Pilkerton.
Attorney-General, for State.
Glenn, Manly & Pendren, for defendant.