The contract between the parties was as follows:
WiNSTÓN, N. C., October 14,1890.
I hereby guarantee S. Shelton against all loss in his investment, in West End Land Oo., in lot No. 190, which cost him $1,250, said Shelton to exercise right as to when said lot shall be sold, which shall not exceed two years from November 1, 1890, on a condition that said S. Shelton will give me five per cent, of the profits realized on the sale of said lot.
(Signed) H. H. Reynolds.
The stipulation "that the defendant should have five per cent, of the profits, if any should be'realized from the investment, was a sufficient consideration to support the agreement of the defendant. It is such a contract as the Courts will enforce. But the objection of the defendant was to its admission as evidence in the case. It was proper that this objection should be overruled. The contract could not be construed till it was put evidence.
There was no error in allowing plaintiff to testify that he showed defendant a paper called a certificate of purchase before he signed the contract. The contents of this writing were properly excluded on the direct examination, it not having been produced.
His Honor did not err when he refused to allow the jury to inspect the original contract, as the defendant’s counsel wished them to do. The circumstances called for the appli*528cation of the rule that there must be allegation as well as proof, and that other rule, stated by his Honor, “ that evidence should be offered to the ears of the jury, and not. to their eyes.” We find no other exceptions in the case. The judgment must therefore be affirmed.
No Error.