The evident design of the ac* c' T^l, was, to allow the Plaintiff interest on the. principal sum recovered in a judgment, from the time of its rendition $ and the direction to the Jury to distinguish, between the principal and interest, was intended to provide for those cases in which the whole sum is assessed in damages, so as to enable the Clerk or the Sheriff, to compute the interest on the principal sum. But where the principal and interest are discriminated on the record, or it can be collected from an inspection of it, what the principal sum was, it it equally within the spirit of the act, that interest should be calculated on that; and as the note is here spread on the record, and the principal of it corresponds precisely with the sum demanded in the writ, it is plain that the verdict was formed on a calculation of the principal and interest, and a deduction of the payment endorsed. There can bo no difficulty in reforming the judgment of the Court according to the act. The objection that no formal judgment was entered in the County Court, cannot prevail without reversing, perhaps, the greater part of the proceedings which have been had for years past. The judgment must be considered as entered according to the opinion which this Court has constantly entertained. — (1 L. Rep. 95, 378.)
It is apparent, that the judgment which this scie fada is brought to revive, was founded upon a debt due by contract, because it was obtained against an administrator, and if so, that it bears interest from its rendition under the act of 1807, (New Rev. ch. 721,) hut either no interest, was given by the Jury, upon the debt due, or if it was, it was added to the principal, and both together made the sum of g190 32. The justice .of the case therefore is, that the Plaintiff should have judgment for S 190 32, with interest (under the act) upon the sum of g 170, part thereof which appears to be -the principal of the sum originally due.
*41 1 think we must say- there is such a record, for although it is apparent that it is very defective for the vrant of entering1 a formal judgment upon the verdict, yet, considering the situation of many of tiie records of the Courts of this State, were we to give a different judgment, it would lead to the greatest injustice and hardship. From these considerations, I think judgment should be given for the Plaintiff, with interest on the sum of $ 170 only until paid.
Judge Henderson concurred.