agreed to the case put by Davenport, Serj. where a jury were had, at the bar to try the issue in the case of one Drake, and dismissed; because the exception, was taken in time. So 2 E. 4. 33. Godb. 399. Noy 97. Jones 172.
Langly v. Stoke, 1 N.C. 260, 1 Mart. 260 (1793)
1793
·
United States Circuit Court for the District of North Carolina
1 N.C. 260, 1 Mart. 260
Langly vs. Stoke.
Hill. 3 Car.
THE plaintiff counted directly in the time of King James, contra pacem domini regis nunc, &c. and, after verdict non allocatur in arrest of judgment, quia matter of form, if the whole had been omitted, it would not have arrested the judgment after verdict.