Higgins v. Crosby, 40 Ill. 79 (1865)

April 1865 · Illinois Supreme Court
40 Ill. 79

Higgins v. Crosby.

(April Term, 1865.)

Joinder in error allowed, if done instanter, pending a motion to reverse for non-joinder, a rule for joinder having expired.

The counsel for the plaintiff in error suggested that a rule to join in error had expired, and there was no joinder; he asked for a default and a reversal for non-joinder in error. The counsel for the defendant said he had not been aware of the rule being entered, and would join in error mstcmter, if allowed to do so.

Per Curiam:

The defendant may still join in error, if he will do so mstcmter.

Motion for default denied.