Opinion of the Court. The cases cited by the appellant’s counsel, do not apply to this case. It is not necessary that each horse should be particularly described. Mentioning the *27number of horses, and an allegation that they were the property of the plaintiff, is sufficient. There is no precedent to be found in the books, in which the property is precisely described, as to its shape, color, &c. A recovery in this action could well be pleaded in bar of a suit, for four black geldings, unless the plaintiff should new-assign, and show them to be other and different ones, from those for which this suit is brought.
As to the second objection, it is sufficient that the aggregate value of all the horses be set forth in the declaration. The judgment of the court below is affirmed. (1)
Judgment affirmed.