delivered the opinion of the Court.
This is an action of assumpsit upon a promissory note, the declaration beginning, “ The Crane Company, a corporation, plaintiff.”
The appellant demurred — the demurrer was overruled— and the appellant abiding by the demurrer, the appellee presented the note, a witness testified to a computation of interest, and the court rendered judgment for the amount due.
*151The only question presented that is not mere rubbish, is, whether the appellee should have set out in the declaration how it became, or is, a corporation.
In effect this was decided in the negative in Bank of Washtenaw v. Montgomery, 2 Scam. 422.
Appearance by a defendant in a name which, not being the name or names of a person or persons, must, to be the name of a legal entity, be the name of a corporation, is an admission that such defendant is a corporation. Supreme Lodge v. Zuhlke, 30 Ill. App. 98.
On the same principle such appearance by a plaintiff is an assertion that it is a corporation, only to be denied by a special plea of nuL tiel corporation. Morris v. Trustees of Schools, 15 Ill. 266.
Tire quotation made from the declaration shows that it contains surplusage—the words “ a corporation ” being unnecessary. Exchange Nat. Bank v. Capps, 32 Neb. 242; S. C., 49 N. W. Rep. 223.
The judgment is affirmed.