delivered the opinion of the court.
The judgment had not been paid and there was no error in permitting the plaintiff in the forcible entry and detainer suit to have both the property and the appeal bond as -security. The property was held in the original suit as security for the judgment, and until that was satisfied he was entitled to possession of the property under the original distress action.
For the reasons stated in this opinion, the judgment of the municipal court is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Taylor, P. J., and Holdom, J., concur.