delivered the opinion of the court.
Fehr Construction Co. v. Postl System of Health Building, 209 Ill. App. 237 (1917)
Fehr Construction Company et al., Appellees, v. Postl System of Health Building, on appeal of Chapin & Gore, Appellant.
Gen. No. 22,920. (Not to be reported in full.)
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Thomas G-. Windes, Judge, presiding.
Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1916.
Affirmed.
Opinion filed December 21, 1917.
Statement of the Case.
Bill by Fehr Construction Company, a corporation, and others, complainants, against Postl System of Health Building and Chapin & Core, a corporation, the owners, defendants, for foreclosure of mechanics’’ liens. From.»a decree foreclosing liens in favor of certain intervening petitioners, the .defendant Chapin & Core appeals.
See 189 Ill. App. 519, for the appeal from a former decree.
William S. Newbttrger and Benjamin P. Ruekberg, for appellant.
M. D. Dolan, for appellees; Freeman K. Blake, of counsel.
Btjlkley, More & Tallmadge, for appellees Harty Bros. & Harty Company.
*238Abstract of the Decision.
1. Appeal and error, § 1725 * —what is effect of decision on former appeal. Questions decided on a former appeal cannot be reopened.
2. Mechanics’ liens, § 196*—when evidence shows knowledge By owners of rendering of work and furnishing of materials. A finding that defendant owners had knowledge of the work to be done and material furnished hy the respective lienors, held not against the manifest weight of the evidence, in a suit on mechanics’ liens.
3. Mechanics’ liens, § 196*—when evidence supports finding as to lienahle and nonlienahle items. Evidence held to support finding as to lienable and nonlienahle items, in a suit on mechanics’ liens.