Bonnet v. Hobrecker, 208 Ill. App. 332 (1917)
Margaret Ann Bonnet, Plaintiff in Error, v. John Hobrecker, Jr., Defendant in Error.
Gen. No. 23,340.
(Not to be reported in full.)
Abstract of the Decision.
1. Appeal and ebbob, § 800 * —what ruling must he preserved hy hill of exceptions. The ruling of the trial court on a motion to vacate an order of dismissal cannot be preserved for review without a hill of exceptions.
2. Appeal and ebbob, § 1120*—when suit will he dismissed. Where a plaintiff in error presents no suggestions in opposition to a motion to dismiss the writ of error and the record presents nothing upon which an assignment of error can properly be made, the suit in which the writ was sued out will be dismissed.
Error to the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Habby C. Moean and Hon. Samuel C. Stough, Judges, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1917.
Suit dismissed.
Opinion filed December 3, 1917.
Statement of the Case.
Motion by John Hohrecker, Jr., defendant in error, to strike from the record portions of the transcript filed by Margaret Ann Bonnet, plaintiff in error, and to affirm the judgment.
Sidney N. Ware, for plaintiff in error.
Custer & Cameron, for defendant in error.