delivered the opinion of the court.
Lambert v. Loomis, 207 Ill. App. 52 (1917)
June 27, 1917
·
Illinois Appellate Court
·
Gen. No. 22,168
207 Ill. App. 52
Eugenie Lambert, trading as Madame Eugenie, Defendant in Error, v. Mrs. L. M. Loomis, Plaintiff in Error.
Gen. No. 22,168.
(Not to be reported in full.)
Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John Court-net, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1916.
Reversed and remanded.
Opinion filed June 27, 1917.
*53Abstract of the Decision.
Sales, § 329 * — when evidence insufficient to support verdict. In an action to recover for goods sold, evidence field insufficient to support a verdict for plaintiff.
Statement of the Case.
Action by Eugenie Lambert, trading as Madame Eugenie, plaintiff, against Mrs. L. M. Loomis, defendant, to recover for goods sold. To reverse a judgment for plaintiff for $63.50, defendant prosecutes this writ of error.
Edmund D. Carter, for plaintiff in error.
James W. Mraz, for defendant in error.