delivered the opinion of the court.
Trafton v. National Council, Knights & Ladies of Security, 198 Ill. App. 347 (1916)
March 27, 1916
·
Illinois Appellate Court
·
Gen. No. 21,681
198 Ill. App. 347
George L. Trafton, Guardian, Defendant in Error, v. National Council, Knights and Ladies of Security, Plaintiff in Error.
Gen. No. 21,681.
(Not to be reported in full.)
Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Jacob H. Hopkins, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1915.
Reversed with finding of facts. ’
Opinion filed March 27, 1916.
Statement of the Case.
Action by George L. Trafton, as guardian of Alfonso, Louise and Jennie Cadamartrie, plaintiff, against Na*348tional Council, Knights and Ladies of Security, defendant, on a benefit certificate issued to Flora Cadamartrie. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff for $967.50, defendant brings error.
This case in its general features and as to the question involved is similar to the case of Kraus v. National Council, Knights and Ladies of Security, ante, p. 345, and Neenan v. Same, 188 Ill. App. 490. Reference is made to the opinions in these eases for description of the character of the benefit certificate and the by-laws.
The defense in this case was that the insured did not pay the assessment under the certificate for the month of July, 1913, before the last day of the month, and for that reason, under the by-laws, she became suspended, and that on August 26, 1913, when she paid the July and August assessments, she was not in good health, a condition necessary to reinstatement.
It was proved that on August 28, 1913, the insured was suffering from a tumor of the uterus, with pressure symptoms which in the opinion of her physician, required the removal of the tumor. Upon his advice she was taken to a hospital and on August 30th an operation was performed removing the tumor and also the uterus, fallopian tubes and ovaries. The tumor was about the size of a fist. The doctor describes it as “quite a large tumor.” It is also not controverted that this tumor had been growing for a period of at least several months prior to this time. Immediately after the operation her heart began to fail, the doctor testifying, “there was a weak heart-muscle, the heart wasn’t strong enough to carry her along during the convalescence.” She died on September 2nd. There was testimony to the effect that she appeared to be in good health on August 26th.
It was contended that the by-laws were not properly introduced ip evidence. They were certified under *349the hand of the national secretary, with the seal of the society affixed.
Abstract of the Decision.
1. Insurance, § 906 * —when evidence sufficient to establish that member of fraternal order not in good health at time of attempted reinstatement. In an action on a benefit insurance policy, evidence held to show that insured, who had failed to pay an assessment for one month and was thus automatically suspended under the rules of the order, was not in good health during the following month at the time of an attempted reinstatement by the payment of the delinquent assessment, and that she was accordingly not a member of such society in good standing at the time of her death.
2. Insurance, § 906*—when evidence sufficient to sustain finding that member of beneficial order not in good health. Evidence that decedent was suffering from a tumor of the uterus, held to prove that she was not in good health.
3. Insurance, § 807*—what constitutes good health within rules of fraternal society as to reinstatement. The words “good health” in the rules of a fraternal insurance society with reference to reinstatement of a member mean that a person is in a reasonably good state of health and free from any disease or illness that tends seriously or permanently to weaken or impair the constitution, and such words do not refer to the appearance of good health.
4. Evidence, § 250*—when by-laws of fraternal society admissible in evidence. By-laws of a fraternal insurance society, certified under the hand of the national secretary and with the society’s seal affixed, were properly introduced in evidence, in compliance with Hurd’s Rev. St. ch. 51, sec. 15 (J. & A. f 5532).
5. Insurance, § 807*—where acceptance of delinquent assessment does not operate to reinstate member of beneficial society in poor *350 health. Where there Is evidence that the “financier” of a fraternal insurance society accepted an assessment which would operate to reinstate decedent in membership in such society providing she was in good health, but there is no evidence that such “financier” knew that she was not in good health, such acceptance did not operate to reinstate decedent, and there is no liability upon her benefit certificate in such society.
*349It was also contended that the defendant waived the provision of the by-laws with reference to good health when the financier of the society accepted the assessment on August 26th.
A. W. Fulton, for plaintiff in error.
J. Marion Miller, for defendant in error.