delivered the opinion of the court.
Groenebeld v. Chicago City Railway Co., 192 Ill. App. 62 (1915)
March 11, 1915
·
Illinois Appellate Court
·
Gen. No. 20,185
192 Ill. App. 62
D. Groenebeld, Defendant in Error, v. Chicago City Railway Company, Plaintiff in Error.
Gen. No. 20,185.
(Not to be reported in full.)
Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. William N. Gbmmill, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1914.
Reversed and remanded.
Opinion filed March 11, 1915.
Statement of the Case.
Action by D. Groenebeld against Chicago City Railway Company to recover for injuries to a horse, which necessitated its being killed. From a judgment for plaintiff for $125, defendant brings error.
*63Abstract of the Decision.
Appeal and error, § 1786 * —when judgment reversed for insufficiency of record. Where, in an action against, a street railway company for injury to a horse, the evidence contained in the record was insufficient to show where or how the accident occurred, a judgment below for plaintiff was reversed.
A. C. Wild and Warren D. Bartholomew, for plaintiff in error; J. R. Guilliams and Frank B. Kriete, of counsel.
James V. Cunningham, for defendant in error.