A judge of the court sua sponte requested a vote on whether to rehear this case en banc. A vote was taken, and the matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the non-recused active judges in favor of *1149en banc consideration. See Fed. R. App. P. 35(f). Rehearing en banc is DENIED.
Naruto v. Slater, 916 F.3d 1148 (2018)
Aug. 31, 2018
·
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth
·
No. 16-15469
916 F.3d 1148
NARUTO, a Crested Macaque, by and Through His Next Friends, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
David John SLATER; Blurb, Inc., a Delaware Corporation; Wildlife Personalities, Ltd., a United Kingdom Private Limited Company, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 16-15469
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
FILED AUGUST 31, 2018
ORDER