Bell v. Wilson, 52 Ark. 173 (1889)

May 1889 · Arkansas Supreme Court

52 Ark. 173

Bell v. Wilson.

Opinion on motion for reconsideration.

It is not ruled in this case, as counsel seems to suppose, that a subsequent creditor .or purchaser may not attack the deed of Moore as a fraud upon his rights. See Adams v.. Edgerton, 48 Ark., 41Q ; Driggs v. Norwood, go Ark., 42. It is only determined that the Allen decree was not evidence of" that fact in this suit.

Motion denied.