John Marcum was indicted for an assault with intent to commit a rape; and was convicted in the Poinsett circuit court of a simple assault, and fined in the sum of one hundred dollars. Judgment was rendered against him for the fine and costs, and the court ordered that he be committed to, and remain in, the custody of the sheriff of Poinsett county until the fine and costs should be paid. The sheriff, thereupon, took him into custody. Marcum then filed a motion for a new trial, which was overruled; tendered a bill of exceptions, which was by the court examined, approved and signed; prayed an appeal to this court; and, together with C. C. Hale, J. N. Thorn and I. W. Duke, executed a covenant that he, Marcum, in case the judgment aforesaid should be affimed by this court, would pay said fine and costs, and costs of appeal and all damages thereon, or surrender himself to be imprisoned and confined in jail in execution of the judgment as required by law, which was filed in court and approved by the clerk; and *399he was discharged from custody. All this, except the finding and return of the indictment, occurred during the April term of the Poinsett circuit court, in the year 1884. . On the 2d day of January, 1885, appellant, the State of Arkansas, filed her complaint in the Craighead circuit court, reciting therein, substantially, the foregoing facts, and alleging that Marcum had failed to perfect his appeal by filing transcript in the office of the clerk of this court within the time prescribed by law, and that he and his sureties had failed to pay said fine and costs ; and praying for judgment against Marcum, Hale, Thorn and Duke, the defendants in the complaint, for the sum of five hundred and forty dollars and twenty cents, the amount of the fine and costs. Appellees demurred to the complaint, because it failed to-state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The court below sustained the demurrer and dismissed the action, and appellant appealed.
The demurrer was properly sustained. No breach of covenant sued on is shown in the complaint. The statute, under which this covenant was executed, does not authorize the granting of appeals from judgments of circuit courts in prosecutions for misdemeanors, except on condition “that the record, is lodged in the clerk’s office of the supreme court, within sixty days after the judgment,” and expressly says: “The appeal shall not suspend the execution of judgment, unless the defendant causes to be executed, before the clerk of the circuit court, a covenant by good security, to be approved by said clerk, for the payment, in case the judgment is affirmed, of the fine and costs, and costs of appeal and all damages thereon, and for the surrender of the defendant in execution of the judgment, when the judgment is for imprisonment, or, on his failure so to surrender himself, for the payment of a sum equal to two dollars for every day of imprisonment adjudged, and causes said covenant to be copied into the transcript, upon which being lodged with the clerk of the supreme court, he *400shall issue a certificate that execution of the judgment is suspended.”
1. Appeal to Supreme Court' Action on appeal bond in misdemean-
Marcum should not have been discharged from custody until he paid the fine and costs, or suffered the penalty for the failure to do so, or until he filed a transcript, with the covenant executed by him and his sureties copied therein, with the clerk of this court, within sixty days after the judgment. Until such transcript, with the covenant copied therein, was filed within the sixty days, there should have been no suspension of the execution of the judgment for fine and costs against him. The transcript was not filed. The covenant sued on thereby became of no effect. No right of action accrued or could accrue on it. Mansf. Dig., Secs. 2463-64.
The judgment of the court below is affirmed.