Hainline v. State, 342 Ark. 5, 25 S.W.3d 413 (2000)

Sept. 7, 2000 · Arkansas Supreme Court · CR 00-798
342 Ark. 5, 25 S.W.3d 413

Daniel Milburn HAINLINE v. STATE of Arkansas

CR 00-798

25 S.W.3d 413

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered September 7, 2000

Davis & Zega, P.A., by: Boyce R. Davis, for appellant.

No response.

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Daniel Milburn Hainline, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion for a rule on the clerk. His attorney, Boyce R. Davis, states in the motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.