On October 23, 1998, the court of appeals certified this matter to this court because it found that the case presented a question pertaining to interpretation of a rule. After reviewing the briefs filed by the parties, we have determined certification is proper on the issue of whether a motion to extend the time for filing the record was properly granted. Because determination of this issue involves the interpretation and application of Ark. R. App. P. — Civ. 5 and may result in dismissal of the appeal as requested by several of the appellants, we accept certification on this question only.
Dugal Logging, Inc. v. Arkansas Pulpwood Co., 335 Ark. 546, 983 S.W.2d 126 (1998)
Dec. 21, 1998
·
Arkansas Supreme Court
·
98-973
335 Ark. 546, 983 S.W.2d 126
DUGAL LOGGING, INC. v. ARKANSAS PULPWOOD COMPANY, INC., et al.
98-973
983 S.W.2d 126
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Opinion delivered December 21, 1998
*547 Vickery & Landers, PLLC, by: Michael R. Landers; and Burbank, Dodson & McDonald, by: Gary D. McDonald, for appellants.
Harrell & Lindsey, P.A., by: Paul E. Lindsey, for appellees.