Norman v. State, 324 Ark. 118, 918 S.W.2d 720 (1996)

April 1, 1996 · Arkansas Supreme Court · CR 95-361
324 Ark. 118, 918 S.W.2d 720

Dinzel NORMAN v. STATE of Arkansas

CR 95-361

918 S.W.2d 720

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered April 1, 1996

George J. Stone, for appellant.

No response.

PER CURIAM.

Counsel, George J. Stone, requests a continuance for filing appellant’s brief. Counsel’s reason is that his law license was suspended on March 8, 1996, because of a deficiency in continuing legal education hours. He states that he expects to cure *119the deficiency on March 29, 1996, and have his license reinstated shordy thereafter.

Counsel’s motion is granted for thirty days. The clerk is directed to set a briefing schedule after the thirty-day period has run. The court forwards this per curiam to the Professional Conduct Committee for its consideration.