The above styled appeal is affirmed for noncompliance with Supreme Court Rule 9 (d), appellant having failed to abstract the complaint, answer, decree and doctor’s report upon which it relies.
Affirmed.
5-5059
447 S. W. 2d 64
Opinion delivered November 10, 1969
[Rehearing denied December 8, 1969.]
Pope, Pratt, Shamburger, Buffalo & Ross; By: Pat Moran, for appellant.
Wendell Utley, W. D. McKay and Larry W. Chandler, for appellee.
Conley Byrd, Justice.
The above styled appeal is affirmed for noncompliance with Supreme Court Rule 9 (d), appellant having failed to abstract the complaint, answer, decree and doctor’s report upon which it relies.
Affirmed.