Lammey v. Eckel, 60 Ark. App. 205, 958 S.W.2d 304 (1998)

Jan. 28, 1998 · Arkansas Court of Appeals · CA 97-1400
60 Ark. App. 205, 958 S.W.2d 304

Allen W. LAMMEY and Melodia L. Lammey, Husband and Wife v. Elmer H. ECKEL and Elsie E. Eckel, Husband and Wife, and Gary Eckel

CA 97-1400

958 S.W.2d 304

Court of Appeals of Arkansas En Banc

Opinion delivered January 28, 1998

Craig Alan Campbell, for appellants.

Sean T. Keith, for appellees.

Per Curiam.

Appellants filed their motion on January 8, 1998, seeking leave to file a belated brief. They caused the record to be lodged with the court on November 21, 1997, but contend *206that, because they did not receive a copy of a “scheduling order” from the court, they did not know that their brief was due December 31, 1997. Appellants request thirty additional days within which to file their brief.

Appellants’ motion is granted, and their brief should be filed not later than January 30, 1998. However, counsel for appellants are referred to Rule 4-4 of the Arkansas Rules of the Supreme Court that very clearly requires an appellant to file an appellant’s brief within forty days of the date the record is lodged. We assume appellants’ reference to “scheduling order” is to the notice that our clerk sends out as a matter of courtesy that sets out the calendar date on which the fortieth day falls. It is the appellants’ responsibility, not our clerk’s, to keep up with the date on which the brief is due to be filed.