Skip to main content
  • ABOUT
  • CASELAW
  • GALLERY
  • LOG IN
  • FOR COURTS
  • CONTACT
  1. Browse
  2. Reporter Ariz.
  3. Volume 212

212 Ariz.

Arizona Reports (1817-2017) volume 212. View scanned PDF. View API.

  • State v. Wall, 212 Ariz. 1, 126 P.3d 148 (2006)
  • Veronica T. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security, 212 Ariz. 7, 126 P.3d 154 (2005)
  • State v. Hollenback, 212 Ariz. 12, 126 P.3d 159 (2005)
  • Chaurasia v. General Motors Corp., 212 Ariz. 18, 126 P.3d 165 (2006)
  • In re Jeremiah T., 212 Ariz. 30, 126 P.3d 177 (2006)
  • Arizona Department of Revenue v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District, 212 Ariz. 35, 126 P.3d 1063 (2006)
  • Lindsey M. v. Rizona Department of Economic Security, 212 Ariz. 43, 127 P.3d 59 (2006)
  • Ziemak v. Schnakenberg, 212 Ariz. 43, 127 P.3d 59 (2006)
  • FL Receivables Trust 2002-A v. Arizona Mills LLC, 212 Ariz. 43, 127 P.3d 59 (2006)
  • Pima County v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc., 212 Ariz. 48, 127 P.3d 64 (2006)
  • State v. Gomez, 212 Ariz. 55, 127 P.3d 873 (2006)
  • In re the General Adjudication of All Rights to Use Water in the Gila River System & Source, 212 Ariz. 64, 127 P.3d 882 (2006)
  • Bentley v. Zensano, Inc., 212 Ariz. 85, 127 P.3d 903 (2006)
  • Hanson Aggregates Arizona, Inc. v. Rissling Construction Group, Inc., 212 Ariz. 92, 127 P.3d 910 (2006)
  • 4501 Northpoint LP v. Maricopa County, 212 Ariz. 98, 128 P.3d 215 (2006)
  • Acuna v. Kroack, 212 Ariz. 104, 128 P.3d 221 (2006)
  • Estate of Winn v. Plaza Healthcare, Inc., 212 Ariz. 117, 128 P.3d 234 (2006)
  • Anderson v. Contes, 212 Ariz. 122, 128 P.3d 239 (2006)
  • Myers v. City of Tempe, 212 Ariz. 128, 128 P.3d 751 (2006)
  • United Dairymen v. Schugg, 212 Ariz. 133, 128 P.3d 756 (2006)
  • Falcon v. Maricopa County, 212 Ariz. 144, 128 P.3d 767 (2006)
  • Kenneth T. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security, 212 Ariz. 150, 128 P.3d 773 (2006)
  • Williams v. Miles, 212 Ariz. 155, 128 P.3d 778 (2006)
  • Mutschler v. City of Phoenix, 212 Ariz. 160, 129 P.3d 71 (2006)
  • Filer v. Tohono O’Odham Nation Gaming Enterprise, 212 Ariz. 167, 129 P.3d 78 (2006)
  • Slade v. Schneider, 212 Ariz. 176, 129 P.3d 465 (2006)
  • Bohsancurt v. Eisenberg, 212 Ariz. 182, 129 P.3d 471 (2006)
  • Foster v. Weir, 212 Ariz. 193, 129 P.3d 482 (2006)
  • Lopez v. Safeway Stores, Inc., 212 Ariz. 198, 129 P.3d 487 (2006)
  • Arizona Commercial Diving Services, Inc. v. Applied Diving Services, Inc., 212 Ariz. 208, 129 P.3d 497 (2006)
  • Espinoza v. Schulenburg, 212 Ariz. 215, 129 P.3d 937 (2006)
  • Fillmore v. Maricopa Water Processing, 212 Ariz. 215, 129 P.3d 937 (2006)
  • In re a Member of the State Bar, 212 Ariz. 221, 129 P.3d 943 (2006)
  • State v. Brown, 212 Ariz. 225, 129 P.3d 947 (2006)
  • State v. Kuck, 212 Ariz. 232, 129 P.3d 954 (2006)
  • Gipson v. Kasey, 212 Ariz. 235, 129 P.3d 957 (2006)
  • Valder Law Offices v. Keenan Law Firm, 212 Ariz. 244, 129 P.3d 966 (2006)
  • Parrot v. DaimlerChrysler Corp., 212 Ariz. 255, 130 P.3d 530 (2006)
  • Forszt v. Rodriguez, 212 Ariz. 263, 130 P.3d 538 (2006)
  • State v. Freitag, 212 Ariz. 269, 130 P.3d 544 (2006)
  • State v. Gastelum, 212 Ariz. 272, 130 P.3d 547 (2006)
  • Dressler v. Morrison, 212 Ariz. 279, 130 P.3d 978 (2006)
  • Miller v. Kelly, 212 Ariz. 283, 130 P.3d 982 (2006)
  • State ex rel. Department of Economic Security v. Demetz, 212 Ariz. 287, 130 P.3d 986 (2006)
  • State ex rel. Thomas v. Schneider, 212 Ariz. 292, 130 P.3d 991 (2006)
  • Sobol v. Marsh, 212 Ariz. 301, 130 P.3d 1000 (2006)
  • In re the Commitment of Flemming, 212 Ariz. 306, 131 P.3d 478 (2006)
  • Curtis v. Richardson, 212 Ariz. 308, 131 P.3d 480 (2006)
  • Sobol v. Alarcon, 212 Ariz. 315, 131 P.3d 487 (2006)
  • Martinez v. Mike, 212 Ariz. 320, 131 P.3d 492 (2006)
  • Carlisle v. Petrosky, 212 Ariz. 323, 131 P.3d 495 (2006)
  • In re Hyrum H., 212 Ariz. 328, 131 P.3d 1058 (2006)
  • Stearns v. Arizona Department of Revenue, 212 Ariz. 333, 131 P.3d 1063 (2006)
  • Waldren v. State ex rel. Department of Economic Security, 212 Ariz. 337, 131 P.3d 1067 (2006)
  • Haines v. Goldfield Property Owners, 212 Ariz. 344, 132 P.3d 283 (2006)
  • Hancock v. Bisnar, 212 Ariz. 344, 132 P.3d 283 (2006)
  • Emmett McLoughlin Realty, Inc. v. Pima County, 212 Ariz. 351, 132 P.3d 290 (2006)
  • Progressive Classic Insurance v. Blaud, 212 Ariz. 359, 132 P.3d 298 (2006)
  • Henry v. Flagstaff Medical Center, Inc., 212 Ariz. 365, 132 P.3d 304 (2006)
  • State v. King, 212 Ariz. 372, 132 P.3d 311 (2006)
  • Johnson v. Earnhardt’s Gilbert Dodge, Inc., 212 Ariz. 381, 132 P.3d 825 (2006)
  • State v. Newell, 212 Ariz. 389, 132 P.3d 833 (2006)
  • Smith v. Arizona Citizens Clean Elections Commission, 212 Ariz. 407, 132 P.3d 1187 (2006)
  • State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Connolly, 212 Ariz. 417, 132 P.3d 1197 (2006)
  • State v. Johnson, 212 Ariz. 425, 133 P.3d 735 (2006)
  • Guerra v. Bejarano, 212 Ariz. 442, 133 P.3d 752 (2006)
  • Salib v. City of Mesa, 212 Ariz. 446, 133 P.3d 756 (2006)
  • Freelance Interpreting Services, Inc. v. State, 212 Ariz. 457, 133 P.3d 1163 (2006)
  • Evans Withycombe, Inc. v. Western Innovations, Inc., 212 Ariz. 462, 133 P.3d 1168 (2006)
  • In re the General Adjudication of All Rights to Use Water in the Gila River System & Source, 212 Ariz. 470, 134 P.3d 375 (2006)
  • State v. Berger, 212 Ariz. 473, 134 P.3d 378 (2006)
  • LaWall v. Pima County Merit System Commission, 212 Ariz. 489, 134 P.3d 394 (2006)
  • Sun Valley Financial Services of Phoenix, L.L.C. v. Guzman, 212 Ariz. 495, 134 P.3d 400 (2006)
  • State v. Booker, 212 Ariz. 502, 135 P.3d 57 (2006)
  • Abuhl v. Howell, 212 Ariz. 513, 135 P.3d 68 (2006)
  • State v. Grell, 212 Ariz. 516, 135 P.3d 696 (2006)
  • Brunet v. Murphy, 212 Ariz. 534, 135 P.3d 714 (2006)
  • P.M. v. Gould, 212 Ariz. 541, 136 P.3d 223 (2006)
  • Butch Randolph & Associates, Inc. v. International Fidelity Insurance, 212 Ariz. 550, 136 P.3d 232 (2006)
  • Mejak v. Granville, 212 Ariz. 555, 136 P.3d 874 (2006)
  • In re King, 212 Ariz. 559, 136 P.3d 878 (2006)

©2021 The President and Fellows of Harvard University. Site text is licensed CC BY-SA 4.0. Source code is MIT licensed. Harvard asserts no copyright in caselaw retrieved from this site.

  • TERMS
  • PRIVACY
  • ACCESSIBILITY