Kurach v. Truck Ins. Exch., 211 A.3d 1252 (2019)

May 29, 2019 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · No. 531 EAL 2018; No. 532 EAL 2018
211 A.3d 1252
Konrad KURACH, Petitioner v. TRUCK INSURANCE EXCHANGE, Respondent Mark Wintersteen, Individually and on Behalf of All others Similarly Situated v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Respondent

Konrad KURACH, Petitioner
v.
TRUCK INSURANCE EXCHANGE, Respondent

Mark Wintersteen, Individually and on Behalf of All others Similarly Situated
v.
Truck Insurance Exchange, Respondent

No. 531 EAL 2018
No. 532 EAL 2018

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

May 29, 2019

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 29th day of May, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Did the Superior Court err as a matter of law in finding that the limitation of payment of General Contractors Overhead and Profit from actual cash value in a replacement cost policy, although violative of binding precedent, was nonetheless valid and enforceable?