Feuer v. Merck & Co., 207 A.3d 264, 238 N.J. 27 (2019)

May 15, 2019 · New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals · A-34 September Term 2018; 081409
207 A.3d 264, 238 N.J. 27

R.A. FEUER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
MERCK & CO., INC., Defendant-Respondent.

A-34 September Term 2018
081409

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued April 24, 2019
Decided May 15, 2019

Lisa J. Rodriguez argued the cause for appellant (Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis, attorneys; Lisa J. Rodriguez, on the brief).

J. Gordon Cooney, Jr., of the Pennsylvania bar, admitted pro hac vice, argued the cause for respondent (Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, attorneys; J. Gordon Cooney, Jr., John McGahren, Marc J. Sonnenfeld, of the Pennsylvania bar, admitted pro hac vice, and Jason H. Wilson, on the brief).

PER CURIAM

The judgment of the Superior Court, Appellate Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Ostrer's opinion, reported at 455 N.J. Super. 69, 187 A.3d 873 (App. Div. 2018).

CHIEF JUSTICE RABNER and JUSTICES LaVECCHIA, ALBIN, PATTERSON, FERNANDEZ-VINA, and TIMPONE join in this opinion. JUSTICE SOLOMON did not participate.