Sipko v. Koger, Inc., 206 A.3d 970, 237 N.J. 581 (2019)

May 6, 2019 · New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals · M-951/953 September Term 2018; 082090
206 A.3d 970, 237 N.J. 581
Robert SIPKO, Plaintiff-Movant, v. KOGER, INC., Koger Distributed Solutions, Inc., Koger Professional Services, Inc., Koger Limited (Dublin), and George Sipko, Defendants-Respondents, and Rastislav Sipko, Defendant.

Robert SIPKO, Plaintiff-Movant,
v.
KOGER, INC., Koger Distributed Solutions, Inc., Koger Professional Services, Inc., Koger Limited (Dublin), and George Sipko, Defendants-Respondents,
and
Rastislav Sipko, Defendant.

M-951/953 September Term 2018
082090

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

May 6, 2019

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motion to dismiss the notice of petition for certification (M-951) is denied; and it is further

ORDERED that the motion for an extension of time within which to file a respondent's brief in opposition to the petition for certification (M-953) is granted, the Court noting that the response was considered an answer in opposition to leave to appeal. (See Order M-950/952/989-18).