Sipko v. Roger, Inc., 206 A.3d 955, 237 N.J. 558 (2019)

May 6, 2019 · New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals · M-950/952/989 September Term 2018; 082090
206 A.3d 955, 237 N.J. 558
Robert SIPKO, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ROGER, INC., Roger Distributed Solutions, Inc., Roger Professional Services, Inc., Roger Limited (Dublin), and George Sipko, Defendants-Movants, and Rastislav Sipko, Defendant.

Robert SIPKO, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
ROGER, INC., Roger Distributed Solutions, Inc., Roger Professional Services, Inc., Roger Limited (Dublin), and George Sipko, Defendants-Movants,
and
Rastislav Sipko, Defendant.

M-950/952/989 September Term 2018
082090

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

MAY 6, 2019

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motions for an extension of time to file an answer in opposition to the motion to dismiss (M-950) and for leave to deem the previously submitted notice of petition for certification and petition for certification as a timely motion for leave to appeal (M-952) are granted; and it is further

ORDERED that the previously submitted notice of petition for certification (C-820) is thereby rendered moot, this matter proceeding instead as a motion for leave to appeal pursuant to M-952; and it is further

ORDERED that the motion for leave to appeal (M-989) is denied.