Rowe v. Bell & Gossett Co., 196 A.3d 978, 235 N.J. 475 (2018)

Nov. 2, 2018 · New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals · M-250 September Term 2018; 081602
196 A.3d 978, 235 N.J. 475
Donna ROWE, Individually and as Executrix and Executrix ad Prosequendum of the Estate of Ronald Rowe, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. BELL & GOSSETT COMPANY, a Subsidiary of ITT Industries, et al., Defendants, and HILCO, Inc., as Successor-In-Interest to Universal Engineering Co., Inc., Defendant-Petitioner.

Donna ROWE, Individually and as Executrix and Executrix ad Prosequendum of the Estate of Ronald Rowe, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
BELL & GOSSETT COMPANY, a Subsidiary of ITT Industries, et al., Defendants,
and
HILCO, Inc., as Successor-In-Interest to Universal Engineering Co., Inc., Defendant-Petitioner.

M-250 September Term 2018
081602

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

November 2, 2018

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motion of the ACE Plumbing and Electrical, et al., for leave to appear as amicus curiae is granted, limited to the filing of the brief that accompanied the motion. If movants seek further participation in the pending appeal, they must seek leave of Court by way of motion.