Piscitelli v. City of Garfield Zoning Bd. of Adjustment, 195 A.3d 1280, 235 N.J. 392 (2018)
May 21, 2018
·
New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
·
C-842 September Term 2017; 079900
195 A.3d 1280, 235 N.J. 392
Vincent PISCITELLI and Rose Mary Piscitelli, Plaintiffs-Petitioners,
v.
CITY OF GARFIELD ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT; et al., Defendants,
and
DSJ Family Trust; Daniel P. Conte, III, Stacey A. Conte and Jamie G. Kreshpane, Trustees of the DSJ Family Trust; and Dr. Daniel P. Conte, Jr., Defendants-Respondents.
C-842 September Term 2017
079900
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
May 21, 2018
*1281To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:
A petition for certification of the judgment in A-002616-15 having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;
It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is granted limited to the issues related to the alleged conflicts of interests of some members of the Zoning Board of Adjustment.