Snell v. Norwalk Yellow Cab, Inc., 169 A.3d 232, 325 Conn. 927 (2017)

May 17, 2017 · Connecticut Supreme Court
169 A.3d 232, 325 Conn. 927

Brenda SNELL
v.
NORWALK YELLOW CAB, INC., et al.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided May 17, 2017

Adam J. Blank and Sarah Gleason, in support of the petition.

Laura Pascale Zaino and Kevin M. Roche, in opposition.

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 172 Conn.App. 38, 158 A.3d 787 (2017), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court correctly determine that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed on the basis that the doctrine of superseding cause applies in cases in which the conduct of a third party is criminally reckless?

"2. Did the Appellate Court correctly determine that the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it denied the plaintiffs motion to set aside the verdict and for a new trial?"

ROGERS, C.J., and ROBINSON, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.