Meadowbrook Ctr., Inc. v. Buchman, 154 A.3d 1007, 324 Conn. 918 (2017)

Feb. 1, 2017 · Connecticut Supreme Court

154 A.3d 1007, 324 Conn. 918

MEADOWBROOK CENTER, INC.
v.
Robert BUCHMAN

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided February 1, 2017

Daniel J. Klau, in support of the petition.

Juri E. Taalman, in opposition.

The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 169 Conn. App. 527, 151 A.3d 404 (2016), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly rule that the time limitation contained in the rules of practice governing motions for attorney's fees in Practice Book § 11-21 is directory and not mandatory?"

PALMER, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.